Biden's IRA and CHIPS Act: 40% of investments now delayed or in limbo

DragonSlayer101

Posts: 457   +2
Staff
In a nutshell: Many of the largest projects announced under the Biden Administration's Inflation Reduction Act and the CHIPS and Science Act have run into issues. According to a new report by the Financial Times, at least $84 billion worth of projects announced under these laws have either been postponed or paused indefinitely.

The CHIPS Act was signed into law by President Joe Biden in 2022 to reduce dependence on China and bolster the domestic EV, renewable energy, and semiconductor industries. The Act aimed to attract significant investments to establish manufacturing facilities in the US and offered more than $400 billion in tax credits, loans, and grants to facilitate the development of a US semiconductor supply chain.

After the IRA and CHIPS Act came into effect, companies announced investment plans worth hundreds of billions, suggesting that the stimulus was working as intended. However, an investigation by the Financial Times has now revealed that many of the announced projects have failed to take off.

The publication claims to have tracked 114 large projects, each worth more than $100 million. The total value of the tracked projects is an impressive $227.9 billion, of which $84 billion, or 40 percent of the total proposed outlay, is now in limbo.

One of the major projects delayed by at least two years is TSMC's proposed $40 billion semiconductor fab near Casa Grande, Arizona. The Taiwanese company's suppliers have also put their investments, worth over $500 million, on hold for up to two years. According to Casa Grande Mayor Craig McFarland, companies are reevaluating their investments due to "higher-than-expected costs," primarily from labor and supply chain challenges.

Several other companies, including solar panel manufacturers Maxeon, Heliene, and Meyer Burger, have also postponed their US factories after prices fell over the past year due to overproduction in China. Some, like auto component manufacturers Samkee and Lear Corporation, are delaying their investments by at least a year. Others, such as electrolyzer manufacturer Nel Hydrogen and battery parts manufacturer Anovion, have delayed their multi-million dollar projects due to a lack of policy certainty in an election year.

Some companies delaying their projects expressed concern over a possible Trump presidency and its implications for IRA and CHIPS funding. The former president has pledged to end the IRA if elected, and the act did not receive any support from Republicans in Congress.

Solar manufacturer VSK Energy scrapped plans to establish a facility in Colorado and is now considering sites in red states to safeguard its project in case Trump is re-elected. According to an unnamed executive from the company, "You probably want to be in a red state so that someone from the same party will fight for you and your rights."

Permalink to story:

 
IMO, no surprises here. These companies see "free money," "come and get all you want" and then find that their own greed has tripped them up. I don't see it as Biden's fault. Greed and companies willing to do anything in the name of profits are the culprits, as I see it. Unfortunately, however, many government programs do not implement any sort of good oversight, and trust the companies to "do the right thing." By now, one would think that the people who write these laws would know better. But, that's bureaucrats for you.

BTW - since TS posted this with a clearly political bent, I bet the comment thread will be closed in short order.
 
What was the deal with the administration's cheap internet deal for low income people? My mom is disabled
(had a stroke a few years back) and lives a lone, and she tried getting that cable/internet deal from what I recall was $35 month but the Comcast said the plain never went through with the Biden/Harris administration.
 
So the “brilliant” government plans were so bad that even with billions in free money companies have realized they *still don't make financial sense*.

It's almost like politicians have no idea how markets work and are only good at promising wishes to get elected.
 
What was the deal with the administration's cheap internet deal for low income people? My mom is disabled
(had a stroke a few years back) and lives a lone, and she tried getting that cable/internet deal from what I recall was $35 month but the Comcast said the plain never went through with the Biden/Harris administration.
I recall something in the news about the gov. ending that thing. It could mean the internet for lowest income people for 60+ bucks soon, which is not little.
 
"...companies are reevaluating their investments due to "higher-than-expected costs," primarily from labor and supply chain challenges." What could be further from the truth.

Ever since sanctions were imposed against China, I've always believed China is going to sit back and wait for companies to start rolling in again, as doing business in the U.S. is less profitable and a cluster...But I wonder how many back room deals were made?
 
The CHIPS Act in my opinion will never work to begin with. It’s a waste of taxpayer’s money to be honest, and mostly not beneficial for the companies tapping into it. The money can barely help with the initial setup cost of mass onshoring of chip making capabilities. This is what happens when there is poor planning and a lack of after thought. It is easy to say, but it is a different thing altogether when it comes to execution. I feel this is yet another setback for Intel as well.
 
15 years later, we're still waiting on the "infrastructure" from Obama's $1.3 trillion 2009 infrastructure act. Biden's $1.7 trillion infrastructure act is equally bad ... pork spending personified.
 

Thanks. This gets more into detail.

Some 206 House Democrats and 24 Republicans have co-sponsored a bill in the chamber to expand the program, with many promoting it as pro-veteran, helpful for low-income households and necessary to connect the tens of millions of participating eligible households to the internet, more than 40% of which are headed by someone over the age of 50.

Congress first allocated $14.2 billion to the Affordable Connectivity Program in December of 2021, and that money—used to provide a $30 to $75 stipend toward internet bills per month and for a one-time discount toward the purchase of a laptop computer, desktop or tablet—is now running out.

A bipartisan longshot effort to save the Affordable Connectivity Program has been introduced in the House and Senate but has faced criticism from some lawmakers, including Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who called it “a massive welfare program” that is “not working as Congress intended.”

Sen. J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) said in a Senate hearing earlier this month. Having an ongoing, guaranteed customer base helps companies pay for service to areas with rougher terrain and fewer people.

“I talked to a number of folks who have invested a lot in rural broadband infrastructure in the state of Ohio who told me straightforwardly they would not have made that investment if not for the existence of the ACP program,” said Vance, who is a cosponsor of both bills.

In November, a bipartisan group of 26 governors sent a letter to congressional leaders in support of the program. By the beginning of February, about 18 percent of U.S. households were benefiting from the ACP.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/maryro...ns-for-millions-of-americans-internet-access/
 
Back