Ex-Twitter exec awarded $600,000 after being fired for not replying to Musk's "hardcore" email

midian182

Posts: 10,027   +132
Staff member
In brief: Former Twitter platform X has been ordered to pay an ex-employee in Ireland more than €550,000 ($602,640) in an unfair dismissal case. The one-time senior executive at the company was found to have been dismissed unfairly after he failed to click "yes" on an email from Elon Musk confirming that staff were willing to be part of the new "hardcore" work culture.

In November 2022, not long after his protracted battle to take over Twitter had ended, Musk emailed staff giving them an ultimatum: they could either agree to the new, extremely hardcore "Twitter 2.0," with its 40-hour-minimum weeks – they could average 60 hours or more – and intense workloads, or leave the company. Employees were given until 5 pm the next day to decide.

"This will mean working long hours at high intensity. Only exceptional performance will constitute a passing a grade," Musk wrote in the email, which had the subject line, "A Fork in the Road."

Agreeing to be part of Musk's vision meant clicking on a link in the email. Musk wrote that those who did not would receive three months of severance pay.

Gary Rooney, who worked in a procurement role at Twitter's international's Dublin office, was one of those who received the email. He never clicked on the link agreeing to be part of Twitter 2.0. Three days later, he received another email from his employer to "acknowledge your decision to resign and accept the voluntary separation offer."

Rooney, who had been with the company since 2013, told Twitter a week later that at no time had he indicated that he was resigning, "nor have I seen any separation agreement let alone accepted one."

The case was taken to Ireland's Workplace Relations Commission (WRC). Rooney said during a hearing that he had loved his job before Musk took over, and that he was initially afraid to open Musk's email over fears it was spam or malware.

Writing in an internal Slack message to a colleague after receiving the email, Rooney said, "I need to step away for my own sake. I'm deeply troubled by whats going on here these days."

Rooney told the WRC that the email didn't explain the kind of package being offered, what the implications of staying at Twitter would be, his stock options, or other benefits.

In a 73-page ruling, adjudication officer, Michael MacNamee, ruled that the dismissal was unfair. Twitter tried to argue that the Slack discussions and his own Tweets about the email indicated that Rooney intended to resign, but the court ruled that these were irrelevant.

"No employee when faced with such a situation could possibly be faulted for refusing to be compelled to give an open-ended unqualified assent to any of the proposals," MacNamee said, adding that 24 hours was not "reasonable notice."

Rooney was awarded €550,131 (around $605,763), made up of €350,131 ($385,538) for lost remuneration from January 2023 to May 2024, and €200,000 ($220,225) for future remuneration.

Twitter's senior director of human resources, Lauren Wegman, told the hearing that 235 of the 270 staff in Ireland who received the email clicked yes. As for the 35 who didn't, Twitter "accepted their resignations." It's likely that some or all of them might be looking at the outcome of the Rooney hearing with interest.

Barry Kenny, Rooney's lawyer, told The Guardian, that he welcomed "the clear and unambiguous finding that my client did not resign from his employment but was unfairly dismissed from his job, notwithstanding his excellent employment record and contribution to the company over the years."

He said: "It is not okay for Mr Musk, or indeed any large company to treat employees in such a manner in this country. The record award reflects the seriousness and the gravity of the case."

Permalink to story:

 
Strange thoughts after reading this article:
1. what could be next is, "if you don't click this link within 24 hrs you agree to be laid off, and if you click this link you agree to 60hr work weeks, no overtime pay, and no raises for the next 5 years"

2. phishing X employees just got a lot easier, "click this link and accept the software installation ASAP or forfeit your annual bonus for non-compliance"
 
what could be next is, "if you don't click this link within 24 hrs you agree to be laid off, and if you click this link you agree to 60hr work weeks, no overtime pay, and no raises for the next 5 years"
Except that's a violation of law, whereas this isn't. Under Irish law, when a employer changes ownership, the new entity is allowed to change the terms of employment, and give employees the option to remain under those terms or resign.

The only thing they could hang on Musk is that the 24-hour response period "wasn't long enough" ... despite the fact that no minimum period is mandated by law, and the employee clearly intended to resign from the start -- he posted a series of rants on Slack immediately upon seeing the email. Even three days later, when he received a confirmation email, he chose to again ignore I.

As for his claim that he didn't open emails from his senior management because "he was afraid it was spam" -- anyone gullible enough to believe that, please raise your hands. The email went to literally the entire company, and was the hottest subject of office discussion at the time.
 
Except that's a violation of law, whereas this isn't. Under Irish law, when a employer changes ownership, the new entity is allowed to change the terms of employment, and give employees the option to remain under those terms or resign.

Except in this case.......... where the judge has just ruled it was against the law. Go figure, a legal expert. I.e., a judge, new the law better than you.
 
Except in this case.......... where the judge has just ruled it was against the law. Go figure, a legal expert. I.e., a judge, new the law better than you.
Lmao. Do yourself a fav and look up how many cases where judges did NOT know the law and or chose to ignore it.
Look at the one asshyat judge in NY for example declaring the 2nd does not exist in their courtroom. Despite the fact that the US constitution is the highest level of law in that regard.

No doubt this will be appealed by X and the odds are not good for that employee since there is clear error of law by the judge.

He may not like the 24hr aspect but by the letter of the law as written by his superiors the actions of the employee failed to accept the new terms of employment and therefore was a voluntary choice of leaving that position. IE. He resigned.

Dosnt matternif you like the notice period or musk or the employee or anything else. It's not about like or dislike. It's about the letter of the law and corporate law in force there was followed.

Personally I would have
made the email 48hrs notice and inc more details. But that'd not my call.

And if the employee had questions re stock or benefits or anything at all it was on HIM to speak up and ask before the deadline. It's that simple. His choice to supposedly ignore the emails as spam eyx dosnt wash and even I'd true is not a defense
Onlybif he did not recieve such and could prove such would he have had any real defense brr the email
 
Except in this case.......... where the judge has just ruled it was against the law. Go figure, a legal expert. I.e., a judge, new [sic] the law better than you.
Oops! Next time read the article before replying. The ruling wasn't issued by a judge, but rather by an "adjudication officer" at Ireland's Workplace Relations Commission. These are contractors hired by the PRC for five-year terms. They are not required to hold any legal qualification or experience whatsoever. They are, though, required to have a college degree (in any field whatsoever) with a 'C' average, and to "be interested in public policy" and "willing to work with a team".

https://www.arthurcox.com/knowledge/workplace-dispute-resolution-in-ireland-is-it-time-for-change/
 
Last edited:

Except that's a violation of law, whereas this isn't. Under Irish law, when a employer changes ownership, the new entity is allowed to change the terms of employment, and give employees the option to remain under those terms or resign.

The only thing they could hang on Musk is that the 24-hour response period "wasn't long enough" ...

It's a ruling of "unfair" as opposed to unlawful, which is what the WRC is mandated to decide, and the ruling itself is legally binding.

The proper thing to do would have been to offer new contacts along with a reasonable reflection period, and everyone would have moved on with their lives.

Now there's a precedent for the 35 follow, and the remaining 230 to claim that they were unreasonably compelled to respond. The bill for that email could run into 10s of millions.

But hey, if we subscribe to the "disrupt and break stuff" culture then what the hell, right?
 
It's a ruling of "unfair" as opposed to unlawful...., and is legally binding.
Thanks for admitting it wasn't unlawful. And while it's legally binding, it can still be appealed.

The proper thing to do would have been to offer new contacts along with a reasonable reflection period, and everyone would have moved on with their lives.
1. New contracts were offered. And for those unwilling to accept them, they were offered three full months of severance pay. Money for nothing.

2. There is no definition of a "reasonable reflection period" in Irish law. The entire point of a legal system is that the rules are written down in advance. You don't just make them up as you go. People and businesses know in advance what's expected of them, and thus aren't unfairly punished for behavior they had no way of knowing would lead to penalties.

Imagine if this same standard was applied to a private individual, not a business. You didn't break any laws, but because some nameless, unelected bureaucrat somewhere decides you were "unfair" -- by his standards and his alone -- you're fined your entire life savings.
 
Last edited:
Except that's a violation of law, whereas this isn't. Under Irish law, when a employer changes ownership, the new entity is allowed to change the terms of employment, and give employees the option to remain under those terms or resign.

The only thing they could hang on Musk is that the 24-hour response period "wasn't long enough" ... despite the fact that no minimum period is mandated by law, and the employee clearly intended to resign from the start -- he posted a series of rants on Slack immediately upon seeing the email. Even three days later, when he received a confirmation email, he chose to again ignore I.

As for his claim that he didn't open emails from his senior management because "he was afraid it was spam" -- anyone gullible enough to believe that, please raise your hands.
I don't know of anyone that accepts a new job or the same job with new managements without a contract. Forcing people to agree to secretive terms and not being told what the new terms, pay, and benefits isn't how normal companies do business. It feels like a scam: "click this right away or you're fired!", and it was a scam from Musk. Who else, but a tyrant, would force people to agree to secretive terms that clearly benefits the company and not the employee?

"The email went to literally the entire company, and was the hottest subject of office discussion at the time." How is that any indication it isn't a scam? The "Iloveyou" virus was mailed out to everyone on the Global Address List and everyone was talking about it.

1. New contracts were offered. And for those unwilling to accept them, they were offered three full months of severance pay. Money for nothing.

There were no contracts included in the "accept or get fired" email. It was either you agree to the new undisclosed terms, or you are fired. It was addressed in the article: "...the email didn't explain the kind of package being offered, what the implications of staying at Twitter would be, his stock options, or other benefits." Who would agree to employment without knowing what the terms are? The new terms could have been a 60 hour work week except during weeks with federal holidays, no paid time off, no comp time, and working most weekends which are all possible under the umbrella of "hardcore" or just any Musk company. Musk motivates people by threatening to fire them if they don't do what he wants. Some former employees say their thirst for tech is gone after leaving the company.
 
Last edited:
Forcing people to agree to secretive terms and not being told what the new terms, pay, and benefits isn't how normal companies do business.
What planet was this posted from? The terms were clear: pay, and benefits aren't changing. People are being offered retention in their current positions, at their current terms. The only change is the work culture: employees not performing exceptionally won't be considered passing. Anyone who's worked a job above a newspaper delivery route knows what that means. If your annual evaluation isn't 'exceptional', then you're not considered passing.

"The email went to literally the entire company, and was the hottest subject of office discussion at the time." How is that any indication it isn't a scam? The "Iloveyou" virus was mailed out to everyone on the Global Address List
Now you're just being silly. After receiving the email, this employee went on social media to trash the email, the firm, and to indicate he intended to do exactly what the email stated, and "move on". The notion that he didn't reply because "he thought it was a scam" is absurd.

There were no contracts included in the "accept or get fired" email. It was either you agree to the new undisclosed terms, or you are fired.
Learn contract law. That email is the exact definition of a contract: an offer for an offer.

For those interested in facts, not propaganda, here's the entire email. Other than the fact it's via email rather than a signed paper copy, it's no different than countless others sent to employees after an M&A event:

"...Going forward, to build a breakthrough Twitter 2.0 and succeed in an increasingly competitive world, we will need to be extremely hardcore. This will mean working long hours at high intensity. Only exceptional performance will constitute a passing grade.

Twitter will also be much more engineering-driven. Design and product management will still be very important and report to me, but those writing great code will constitute the majority of our team and have the greatest sway. At its heart, Twitter is a software and servers company, so I think this makes sense.

If you are sure that you want to be part of the new Twitter, please click yes on the link below:

Anyone who has not done so by 5pm ET tomorrow (Thursday) will receive three months of severance.

Whatever decision you make, thank you for your efforts to make Twitter successful.
"
 
Back